🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more allowing the radical right to dictate the public discourse, according to a recent research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical parties by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Coverage

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national newspapers.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central themes like integration and immigration, mainstream parties increasingly adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by established parties is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a political sociologist participating in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was noticeable even when conventional groups were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect countries across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," explained another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a former German chancellor called for large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar examples can be found across the continent, as politicians from countries ranging from the UK to France embrace the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has created an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Some parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline platform of the radical right, even as research suggests that doing so leads voters to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Voter Awareness

The scope of information gathered showed that the influence of radical parties had been gradual and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the need for mainstream parties to develop their distinct narratives, particularly on subjects such as migration and integration, instead of constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."